Northwest Syria Cash Working Group Earthquake Response Bulletin

1. MPC response overview

As of 15 June 2023, a total of 627,464 persons or 125,112 families have been reached by MPC interventions.

A total of USD 20.1 million has been disbursed by 29 implementing agencies in 255 communities across 35 sub-districts.

Only beneficiaries who have received at least USD 100/family/month have been included; excludes sector-based activities such as non-MPC cash-for-food.

627,000 people reached with MPC, USD 20.1 million disbursed, 15 June 2023

governorate	district	comm.	partners	households	beneficiaries	total_usd	%_BNF1
Aleppo	A'zaz	12	12	3,821	17,880	540,053	2.85
Aleppo	Afrin	106	19	31,247	152,816	4,614,739	24.35
Aleppo	Al Bab	5	6	8,426	43,577	1,251,476	6.94
Aleppo	Jarablus	2	4	951	3,022	122,700	0.48
Aleppo	Jebel Saman	18	9	10,168	58,204	1,497,102	9.28
Ar-Raqqa	Tell Abiad	2	1	394	2,141	27,496	0.34
Idleb	Ariha	3	3	576	2,051	69,100	0.33
Idleb	Harim	54	19	59,439	255,689	8,834,434	40.75
Idleb	Idleb	27	16	15,447	75,400	2,624,806	12.02
Idleb	Jisr-Ash-Shugur	27	5	4,270	16,684	552,562	2.66
Total	-	-	-	134,739	627,464	20,134,468	100.00
1As percentage of all MPC beneficiaries reached in NW Syria

151,559 beneficiary frequencies were reached in February 2023 and 219,352 were reached in March 2023. 158,123 were reached in April 2023 and 96,089 have been reached in May 2023 and 32,814 have been reached in June 2023.

This document distinguishes between beneficiaries, or unique individuals reached, and beneficiary frequencies, or the number of times people have been reached, inclusive of double counting.

1.1 Progress by date

The small number of beneficiaries reached earlier than February all pertained to the HRP, the only such beneficiaries reported so far. The CWG would like to encourage partners to report on their January achievements.

2. Map of activities

3. Geographic breakdown of beneficiaries

Coverage continues to be highest in Afrin and Harim districts, where the highest numbers of damaged houses and wounded people are located (though these areas do not necessarily have the highest proportions of damage).

Casualties and damaged houses, absolute figures and per 100,000 persons

governorate	district	wounded_dead1	wounded_dead_100k1	damaged_houses1	damaged_houses_100k1
Aleppo	A'zaz	356	57.87	276	44.86
Aleppo	Afrin	2,232	478.79	2,910	624.22
Aleppo	Al Bab	206	70.04	832	282.89
Aleppo	Jarablus	40	33.82	257	217.30
Aleppo	Jebel Saman	616	236.80	176	67.66
Idleb	Harim	8,449	507.65	3,230	194.07
Idleb	Idleb	350	48.23	946	130.37
Idleb	Jisr-Ash-Shugur	595	183.68	1,915	591.18
1Data from the Assistance Coordination Unit, Syria 20230328;

Below is a breakdown of beneficiaries based on whether they originate from camps or villages. The majority of MPC beneficiaries are from villages.

More than twice as many beneficiaries from villages as from camps

village_camps	beneficiaries	%_beneficiaries
camp	111,982	17.85
village	270,702	43.14
NA	244,780	39.01

3.1 By sub-district

The plots below show the breakdown of beneficiaries by sub-district. Caution must be taken to ensure that allocations are fair across the affected areas: there are numerous sub-districts where a very large proportion of the total population has already been reached by multi-purpose cash, in particular, Jandairis, Harim, Salqin and Sharan.

Response activities must be proportional with the magnitude and severity of earthquake damage. Overallocation deprives affected persons of the aid they are due.

The average percentage of the population reached, of all sub-districts, is 10.08%.

3.2 Comparisons with PIN and earthquake damage

The plot below shows the total population of each sub-district on the x-axis (for the moment, all persons in these areas are assumed to be affected and are included in the PIN) and the number of beneficiaries on the y-axis.

The size of each point indicates the number of dead or wounded persons there per 100,000.

The higher or lower a sub-district is above the blue line, the more disproportionate the number of beneficiaries allocated to that location are.

This should also be compared to each sub-district’s share of the earthquake damage. Of particular note, sub-districts in grey have yet to receive any MPC assistance.

The CWG has also produced an inter-sectoral dataset at community-level which should aid in the targeting of under-allocated areas.

3.3 Planned activities

Whilst it is heartening to see new sub-districts, the majority of planned allocations have been accorded to areas that have already received relatively high levels of support.

14 partners have reported planned activities

project_status	partners	beneficiaries	%_beneficiaries
Completed	28	627,464	72.44
Planned	14	233,542	26.96
Suspended	1	5,148	0.59

The sum of planned beneficiaries is 238,097. If this is the extent of all planned MPC activities, the CWG as a whole can expect to reach 130% of its target of 662,924 persons. But whilst the scale of achievements is important, it is also key to ensure that allocations are fair.

Planned beneficiaries by month

month1	beneficiaries
Apr	11,226
May	24,528
Jun	59,000
Jul	74,620
Aug	38,920
Nov	3,113
NA	26,690
1Some dates are missing or improperly encoded;

4. Cash response actors and cash disbursed

USD 20.1 million has been distributed across 255 communities and 35 sub-districts in NW Syria.

Reach and footprint of cash response actors

implementing_partner1	beneficiary_freq	districts	communities
GOAL (GOAL)	135,696	4	94
Shafak Organization (SO)	116,063	7	37
International Rescue Committee (IRC)	94,708	3	22
Ihsan for Relief and Development (IRD)	51,098	6	32
Ataa Humanitarian Relief Association (ATAA)	51,058	9	37
Mercy-USA for Aid and Development (MUSA)	27,905	5	37
Violet Organization (VO)	27,195	3	24
Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC)	22,850	2	4
CBRTWG-031	18,490	4	42
Mercy Without Limits (MWL)	16,460	4	10
People in Need (PIN)	12,804	5	6
World Vision International (WVI)	12,048	1	4
Bahar Organization (BO)	12,000	1	1
Uluslararasi Insani Yardimlasma Dernegi (IYD)	11,449	4	16
Insan Charity	7,874	1	1
Solidarités International (SI)	7,058	1	5
International Humanitarian Relief (IHR)	6,654	3	9
Hand in Hand For Syria (HIHFS)	6,651	1	7
Syria Relief (SR)	5,350	3	5
Welthungerhilfe (WHH)	4,830	4	4
CBRTWG-033	3,538	3	7
Social Development International (SDI)	3,427	2	3
Elaf for Relief and Development (ELAF)	3,300	2	2
Ghiras Al Nahda (GAN)	3,050	1	2
Bonyan Organization (BO)	2,951	1	4
The Syrian Est. for Human Care and Development (Massrat)	2,692	3	3
Al-Sham Humanitarian Foundation (AHF)	1,980	7	7
Syrian Association for Relief and Development (SARD)	1,683	3	4
Seeds Of Hope Relief and Development (SOH)	721	1	1
1Only partners who provided more than USD 100/family/month;

In the scatterplot below, each point is a single cash working group partner. The x-axis indicates the number of beneficiary frequencies reached per agency and the y-axis indicates the number of communities (admin4) reached. Mouse over each point for more details.

4.1 Cash disbursed per partner

Cash disbursed and families reached by partner

implementing_partner	total_usd	families	usd_per_fam	%_usd_total
GOAL (GOAL)	4,284,900	28,566	150.00	21.28
Shafak Organization (SO)	3,284,200	22,581	145.44	16.31
International Rescue Committee (IRC)	2,515,050	16,767	150.00	12.49
Ataa Humanitarian Relief Association (ATAA)	2,143,188	11,275	190.08	10.64
Ihsan for Relief and Development (IRD)	1,484,550	9,897	150.00	7.37
Violet Organization (VO)	862,200	5,748	150.00	4.28
Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC)	636,300	4,242	150.00	3.16
Mercy-USA for Aid and Development (MUSA)	561,900	5,718	98.27	2.79
CBRTWG-031	548,800	3,691	148.69	2.73
Mercy Without Limits (MWL)	438,372	3,325	131.84	2.18
People in Need (PIN)	411,450	2,743	150.00	2.04
Uluslararasi Insani Yardimlasma Dernegi (IYD)	375,000	2,500	150.00	1.86
Bahar Organization (BO)	360,000	2,400	150.00	1.79
Welthungerhilfe (WHH)	344,400	2,296	150.00	1.71
World Vision International (WVI)	301,200	2,008	150.00	1.50
Solidarités International (SI)	218,250	1,455	150.00	1.08
Hand in Hand For Syria (HIHFS)	210,079	1,400	150.06	1.04
International Humanitarian Relief (IHR)	179,250	1,195	150.00	0.89
Syria Relief (SR)	160,500	1,070	150.00	0.80
Elaf for Relief and Development (ELAF)	160,000	600	266.67	0.79
Insan Charity	150,000	1,500	100.00	0.74
Ghiras Al Nahda (GAN)	91,500	610	150.00	0.45
Bonyan Organization (BO)	86,471	575	150.38	0.43
Social Development International (SDI)	85,650	571	150.00	0.43
The Syrian Est. for Human Care and Development (Massrat)	81,000	540	150.00	0.40
CBRTWG-033	56,200	622	90.35	0.28
Syrian Association for Relief and Development (SARD)	46,948	341	137.68	0.23
Al-Sham Humanitarian Foundation (AHF)	41,250	330	125.00	0.20
Seeds Of Hope Relief and Development (SOH)	15,860	173	91.68	0.08

The CWG is currently working with other Clusters to consolidate all cash-based activities and will soon be able to provide more comprehensive reporting.

4.2 Currency disbursed

A total of 88.6% of cash disbursed was in USD.

Proportion of cash disbursed by currency

currency	total_usd	%_of_total
TRY	2,296,208	11.4
USD	17,838,258	88.6
Total	20,134,466	100.0

5. Annexes

5.1 Interactive reference table at sub-district level

Columns include: governorate, district, sub-district, total population, beneficiaries, total usd disbursed, wounded and dead, wounded and dead per 100k, damaged houses, damaged houses per 100k, admin3pcode

5.2 Reporting quality

This section documents issues encountered in the cleaning of 4W and FSL data and their impacts on the quality of reporting the CWG can provide. The recommendations by the CWG are included to enhance reporting quality:

1. The CWG has shifted into a new 4Ws template for monthly reporting to better capture the earthquake response. Deadline is set on the 15th of each month. 9 partners reported achievements in February and 11 reported achievements in March, with 18 partners having reported in April, 17having reported in May and 5having reported in June. If no MPC activities were implemented, please inform the CWG as well.

2. For this reporting period, activities pertaining to 5,429 beneficiaries were missing their dates or had dates in unreadable formats. Please ensure that the start date and end date are entered in the format mm/dd/yyyy and select the month of reporting from the options in the drop down menu.

3. For sex-and-age disaggregations, please do not back fill these columns using calculations based on the census or the MSNA. If no disaggregated data is available to your organisation, please leave these columns blank.

4. The Cash Working Group is currently only collecting planned and implemented Multipurpose Cash achievements. Whilst the CWG welcomes additional inputs on other CVA activities, we also want to ensure that the reporting load is as low as possible for partners i.e. if an agency has implemented Cash-for-Work, this should be reported to the ERL Cluster. The CWG will work with all Clusters to develop a consolidated picture of response-wide CVA interventions.

5. Please indicate in the previously_assisted column whether or not beneficiaries have been reached before. However, beneficiaries are being reported to the Cash Working Group for this first time, even if you have reached them before, please indicate No in this column. This column is used calculate the number of unique individuals reached.